Inside Philanthropy - Oprah Winfrey
Net worth: $3 billion
Main Source: Oprah Winfrey Show/Harpo Productions/Winfrey Network
Love to Know - Charities of Oprah Winfrey
Main Charities:
- The Angel Network
- supports and pulicizes on her talk show hoping to get audience "to be more involved in giving and volunteering"
- collects millions of $'s in donation then gives grants to organizations focusing on her initiatives (education, developing leaders, protecting human rights, making support communities)
- started in 1997/98
- pays all overhead and operating costs herself & 100% of donation goes to funding a project
- The Oprah Winfrey Foundation
- runs it exclusively
- provides grants (funded by her personally) to non-profit organizations
- no donations or grant applications; she chooses charities
- The Oprah Winfrey Operating Foundation
- exclusively for Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls in South Africa
- began in 2007
Other Charities:
- O Ambassadors
- school-based program which encourages kids "to give and act on behalf of their peers in underdeveloped countries"
- The US Dream Academy
- after school program that works with children who have a parent in jail
- aims to "break the cycle of incarceration"
- Oprah is one of the biggest supporters
Bio. - Oprah Winfrey Biography
- single mother in Mississippi
- sexually abused by several male relatives and friends of her mother when she was young
- launched The Oprah Winfrey Show in 1986
- Harpo Productions (Oprah backwards)
- Oprah's Book Club --> put many unknown authors on top of bestseller lists & renewed popularity of pleasure reading
- co-founded Oxygen Media --> dedicated to "producing cable internet programming for women"
- Angel Network has raised more than %52 million for charitable programs
- proposed a bill to Congress, which was passed in 1994, making a nationwide database of convicted child abusers
CNN - Oprah Wifrey Fast Facts
- President Clinton signed "Oprah Bill"
- "Oprah's Book Club" = influential in the publishing world
- "Oprah Winfrey Show" was originally called "AM Chicago"
- Won the Bob Hope Humanitarian Award in 2002
- Opened school for girls in 2007 ($40 million to open)
- houses 152 girls from bad backgrounds and gives them education
- OWN was originally "Discovery Health Channel"
- was honored at the Kennedy Center in 2010 at 33rd annual Kennedy Center Honors gala
- received the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in 2001
- Awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Obama in 2013
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Thursday, December 8, 2016
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
Learning About Issues and Innovations
In order to keep up with the growing trend of not only the quality of the products, but also how they are produced, major companies such as Nike and Apple are constantly working to improve the production of their products. One major factor that the companies are paying attention to is the environment. They are looking closer to how the making of their products are affecting the environment. For example, on the Nike website there is a whole page dedicated to informing the public about how they halved their energy usage, reduced their water usage, and using leftover materials and wastes to make products.
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Friday, November 18, 2016
Smoke Signals
For modern-day Native Americans, aspects of their culture such as storytelling, ancestral bonds, and being connected or returned to nature can help them find power and meaning. On the other hand, being stuck on the reservation, money troubles, alcoholism and obesity, and the need to act like the stereotypical Indian can be problems that keep them from excelling. In the film Smoke Signals, directed by Chris Eyre, both the good and bad sides of present-day Indian life and culture can be observed. The movie follows the story of two Native American boys as they come to terms with who they are and what it means to be Indians.
At the beginning of the movie, the audience sees Arnold's alcoholism and his families money problems. On several occasion, when Victor has a flashback to his childhood interactions with his father, Arnold can be seen drunk and angry. The audience sees Arnold slapping or hitting his son or wife in two of Victor's flashbacks. Later in the movie, when Victor has made the decision to go get some of his father's belongings, he runs into a problem: he doesn't have the money. Only when Thomas offer him some of the money he has saved, can Victor go get Arnold's things without having to walk the long distance.
One of the main characters, Victor, can be seen throughout the movie struggling to figure out what it means to be a Native American today in the United States. With an alcoholic father who left him and his mother when he was young, his only role model on being an Indian man is American stereotypes from movies, TV, and books. In one scene of the movie, the audience sees Victor get onto Thomas for "smiling too much" and wearing a suit. He tells Thomas that "Indians are supposed to be stoic and brave-faced" like no one can mess with them. He is later corrected by Thomas who tells him that they were actually descended from a tribe of fishermen, not great warriors. Victor sees himself as the American stereotype of a brave-faced warrior that can't be messed with. This is because his only role model left him as a kid and the only thing telling him how he was "supposed" to act was American entertainment.
The other main character in the film, Thomas, can be seen seeming to already accept and understand what being a Native American man is in the modern United States. In several scenes of the movie, he is telling stories, either to fill the silence or, one time, as payment for a ride. A big part of the Native American culture was - and still is - storytelling. The point of Indian storytelling, however, wasn't always just to inform the listeners of what had already taken place. Sometimes the story was told for purely entertaining purposes or even to teach a lesson about life. Thomas tells stories to several characters in the movie for several reasons: to trade for a ride to the bus station, to make someone laugh, or even to teach someone a lesson.
Another big part of the Native America culture is being connected or returned back to nature. When the two arrive back home, Victor gives Thomas some of Arnold's ashes with which he could do what he wanted. In one of the final scenes of the movie, Victor takes the remainder of his father's ashes and throws them in a river, returning him back to nature. With the release of Arnold's ashes, the release of Victor's internal struggles can be seen. The audience can see Victor come to terms with who his is and what that means for him.
This film is great, not only for seeing the daily life of some of the modern-day Native Americans, but also seeing the internal struggles they have with figuring out who they are and what it means to be an Indian today in the United States.
At the beginning of the movie, the audience sees Arnold's alcoholism and his families money problems. On several occasion, when Victor has a flashback to his childhood interactions with his father, Arnold can be seen drunk and angry. The audience sees Arnold slapping or hitting his son or wife in two of Victor's flashbacks. Later in the movie, when Victor has made the decision to go get some of his father's belongings, he runs into a problem: he doesn't have the money. Only when Thomas offer him some of the money he has saved, can Victor go get Arnold's things without having to walk the long distance.
One of the main characters, Victor, can be seen throughout the movie struggling to figure out what it means to be a Native American today in the United States. With an alcoholic father who left him and his mother when he was young, his only role model on being an Indian man is American stereotypes from movies, TV, and books. In one scene of the movie, the audience sees Victor get onto Thomas for "smiling too much" and wearing a suit. He tells Thomas that "Indians are supposed to be stoic and brave-faced" like no one can mess with them. He is later corrected by Thomas who tells him that they were actually descended from a tribe of fishermen, not great warriors. Victor sees himself as the American stereotype of a brave-faced warrior that can't be messed with. This is because his only role model left him as a kid and the only thing telling him how he was "supposed" to act was American entertainment.
The other main character in the film, Thomas, can be seen seeming to already accept and understand what being a Native American man is in the modern United States. In several scenes of the movie, he is telling stories, either to fill the silence or, one time, as payment for a ride. A big part of the Native American culture was - and still is - storytelling. The point of Indian storytelling, however, wasn't always just to inform the listeners of what had already taken place. Sometimes the story was told for purely entertaining purposes or even to teach a lesson about life. Thomas tells stories to several characters in the movie for several reasons: to trade for a ride to the bus station, to make someone laugh, or even to teach someone a lesson.
Another big part of the Native America culture is being connected or returned back to nature. When the two arrive back home, Victor gives Thomas some of Arnold's ashes with which he could do what he wanted. In one of the final scenes of the movie, Victor takes the remainder of his father's ashes and throws them in a river, returning him back to nature. With the release of Arnold's ashes, the release of Victor's internal struggles can be seen. The audience can see Victor come to terms with who his is and what that means for him.
This film is great, not only for seeing the daily life of some of the modern-day Native Americans, but also seeing the internal struggles they have with figuring out who they are and what it means to be an Indian today in the United States.
Thursday, November 10, 2016
The Sioux Chef



NY Times -The Movement to Define Native American Cuisine
The Sioux Chef - An Indigenous Kitchen
Monday, October 31, 2016
Historic Newspaper: Albany, OR
![]() |
Albany, Oregon 1871 |
Another thing that can be found in the typical newspaper is ads. Ads for doctors, different medical drugs, new products, etc.
![]() |
Medicine from late 1800's |
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
Human Trafficking
Human trafficking can come in many forms. Some such forms are black market organ trafficking, human sex trading, and child labor. Parallels can be found in the causes and victims of all of these forms and slavery in America. Three of the main causes of these things are as follows:
- poverty or extremes of rich and poor
- impoverished, uneducated, and/or displaced people
- lack of legal protection for a religious or ethnic minority
All of these factors play a role in causing and enabling the enslavement or use of a group of people. The victims of these abuses are normally minorities or groups seen as "weaker" or with "lower intelligence". Most victims are girls, ethnic or religious minorities, etc.
- poverty or extremes of rich and poor
- impoverished, uneducated, and/or displaced people
- lack of legal protection for a religious or ethnic minority
All of these factors play a role in causing and enabling the enslavement or use of a group of people. The victims of these abuses are normally minorities or groups seen as "weaker" or with "lower intelligence". Most victims are girls, ethnic or religious minorities, etc.
Friday, September 30, 2016
Child Labor in India
India has one of the largest child labor problems in the world with 1 in every 11 children in India working. An unbelievable 62.8% of that population is made up of 15-17-year-old's doing hazardous work. The percent of working children operating in hazardous situations 20.7% while the percent of adults working in hazardous situations is 25%.
India's government did reform one of it's child labor laws allowing children under 14 to work in "family businesses" and the "entertainment industry".
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
History in Film
![]() |
Cover of Northup's Book |
![]() |
Cover of Glory |
![]() |
Pre-Battle Scene from Glory |
![]() |
Patsey, Epps, and Solomon (left to right) |
![]() |
Mrs. Epps scratching Patsey |
Watching a film in class can be educational if the right movie is picked. In history class, we were
able to get two very different perspectives from the pre-Civil War era. By watching these films, we did not just learn about the facts and events that took place, we also got to glimpse into the cultural norms of those living before and during the Civil War.
Sources:
This site confirmed that the events involving Patsey and Mrs. Epps were true.
Sources:
Slate - “How Accurate was 12 Years a Slave?”
I used this to find out what events in the 12 Years a Slave film were taken from the book and
which happenings were made up or added.
I used this to find out what events in the 12 Years a Slave film were taken from the book and
which happenings were made up or added.
Bowdoin College - Master-Slave Relations
This gave me more detailed information on the relationships between the master of the
plantation and female slaves.
This gave me more detailed information on the relationships between the master of the
plantation and female slaves.
PBS - Letters to R.C. Ballard Regarding Slave Woman Abuse
These primary sources helped strengthen the argument about the abuse of female slaves.
These primary sources helped strengthen the argument about the abuse of female slaves.
literate. But now Harriet Jacobs has reclaimed her name.
The story of this female slave was an example of the abuse of female slaves.
The story of this female slave was an example of the abuse of female slaves.
Slavery and 21st Century Sex Trafficking
This source gave information on the business of "renting" female slaves.
This source gave information on the business of "renting" female slaves.
Mistresses
This blog gave general information on the topic of plantation mistresses and their roles on the
plantation.
This blog gave general information on the topic of plantation mistresses and their roles on the
plantation.
Richmond University - The Varying Roles of Plantation Mistresses in the Antebellum South
I used this source to get a more detailed idea about plantation mistresses and why they might lash out
at slaves.
I used this source to get a more detailed idea about plantation mistresses and why they might lash out
at slaves.
Armstrong University - Paternalism and the Southern Hierarchy: How Slavery Defined Antebellum
Southern Women
This source informed me of other reasons for plantation mistresses being violent towards their slaves.
Southern Women
This source informed me of other reasons for plantation mistresses being violent towards their slaves.
Inquiries Journal - Sexual Relations Between Elite White Women and Enslaved Men in the Antebellum
South: A Socio-Historical Analysis
This article gave me information on the behavior of plantation mistresses other than being violent to
slaves.
South: A Socio-Historical Analysis
This article gave me information on the behavior of plantation mistresses other than being violent to
slaves.
Web Archaeology - Levi Jordan Plantation: Sallie McNeill’s Diary
This diary of a plantation girl was a great primary source for getting inside the head of a plantation
mistress and seeing how she feels towards her slaves.
History vs. Hollywood - 12 Years A Slave This diary of a plantation girl was a great primary source for getting inside the head of a plantation
mistress and seeing how she feels towards her slaves.
This site confirmed that the events involving Patsey and Mrs. Epps were true.
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
Reflection on Paraphrase Practice
In history class, we learned different methods of paraphrasing and quoting others. I discovered that instead of paraphrasing, I tend to write something different than the original source and only slightly touch on the original subject. This means that I need to focus on really understanding what idea the original source is exploring and write the idea in a way that is easier to understand.
I also discovered several ways to quote a source. I learned that I don't always have to write out the entire quotation. Rather, I can use an ellipses to skip the unneeded information in the original quote, use brackets to further explain something vague within a quote, or even break up the quote into different pieces and incorporate the fragments into my own idea.
This is what I learned today:
- Only use a direct quote when it adds power and style to my writing.
- Always make it clear, from context, that I understand the full meaning of the quote.
- Whether I quote or paraphrase, I must always be transparent about the source and how I'm using it.
- If I use another author's exact words or phrases, to any extent, I have to use quotation marks and give credit.
- If I use another author's presentation of facts or idea, but put their ideas in my own words, (paraphrase) I better have a good reason for doing so, and I MUST give credit.
- Hyperlinking is so easy, there is no excuse for not being transparent about my sources.
I understand the above statements. I only need to work on reading the quote or idea to a deeper extent and focus on staying with the original idea or supporting the quotation I have used.
I also discovered several ways to quote a source. I learned that I don't always have to write out the entire quotation. Rather, I can use an ellipses to skip the unneeded information in the original quote, use brackets to further explain something vague within a quote, or even break up the quote into different pieces and incorporate the fragments into my own idea.
This is what I learned today:
- Only use a direct quote when it adds power and style to my writing.
- Always make it clear, from context, that I understand the full meaning of the quote.
- Whether I quote or paraphrase, I must always be transparent about the source and how I'm using it.
- If I use another author's exact words or phrases, to any extent, I have to use quotation marks and give credit.
- If I use another author's presentation of facts or idea, but put their ideas in my own words, (paraphrase) I better have a good reason for doing so, and I MUST give credit.
- Hyperlinking is so easy, there is no excuse for not being transparent about my sources.
I understand the above statements. I only need to work on reading the quote or idea to a deeper extent and focus on staying with the original idea or supporting the quotation I have used.
Monday, September 12, 2016
Practicing Incorporating a Quotation
Movie Review of Glory
The movie Glory is often shown in high school history classes. Unlike most other historical movies, this movie goes slightly farther. The review of Glory on Reel View says, "the filmmakers weave an impressively large historical tapestry without ever losing sight of the characters that make up the individual threads." In the film, unlike some other historical movies, several different perspectives are examined. The watcher sees the war from the perspective of a person of power, but also from the perspectives of several of the black soldiers. The film also goes farther than most others by using actual primary sources in order to write the script and some scenes in the movie.
Paraphrase Practice
Reel Views:
"Obviously, the issue of racial inequality is at the film's forefront. The Massachusetts 54th began a long and proud tradition in the United States army of black units acquitting themselves admirably on the battlefield, despite rarely being given their due by their fellow white soldiers. What began with the 54th regiment continued throughout the Civil War and through two world wars. The greatest achievement of the 54th was to prove to the army that black soldiers could be relied upon to fight with the same tenacity and patriotism as white soldiers."
My paraphrase:
One of the main themes in Glory is racial inequality. The film shows the experience of the first in a long series of all-black units used in the United States army. In the film, the African-American soldiers are ridiculed by not only white soldiers, but each other as well, and are not given credit for their work for the army, much like the all-black units after them. Even so, they are desperate to fight in a real battle, and when they finally do they fight reliably and give their lives just as their white counterparts did.
"Obviously, the issue of racial inequality is at the film's forefront. The Massachusetts 54th began a long and proud tradition in the United States army of black units acquitting themselves admirably on the battlefield, despite rarely being given their due by their fellow white soldiers. What began with the 54th regiment continued throughout the Civil War and through two world wars. The greatest achievement of the 54th was to prove to the army that black soldiers could be relied upon to fight with the same tenacity and patriotism as white soldiers."
My paraphrase:
One of the main themes in Glory is racial inequality. The film shows the experience of the first in a long series of all-black units used in the United States army. In the film, the African-American soldiers are ridiculed by not only white soldiers, but each other as well, and are not given credit for their work for the army, much like the all-black units after them. Even so, they are desperate to fight in a real battle, and when they finally do they fight reliably and give their lives just as their white counterparts did.
Friday, September 2, 2016
How Could Slavery Happen?
Today, if you were to ask someone about slavery, the response would almost always be negative. Something like, "I don't understand how people could do that," or, "It was so wrong of people to do that to another person." But what we don't realize is that the reason that slavery was allowed to happen is because there are several psychological components that play a part in that kind of situation. In history class this week, we read about two well-known studies on the psychology of people that can help us better understand why this happened. We also connected the growth of production of cloth to the worsening of slavery.
The experiment that is of more help when learning about slavery is Stanford Prison Experiment. This experiment was conducted to see just how far a person with total power would go. In the experiment, a group of students was randomly divided into "prisoners" and "prison guards". They were placed in a makeshift prison and told to act as if this were a real situation. At first, none of the students really took it seriously, but after a very short period of time, the "guards" began to get violent. Once the violence began taking place, things only went down hill. The "guards" became overly violent and some of the "prisoners" became so mentally unstable that they had to be removed from the experiment and reminded that it wasn't real. The experiment had to be ended early, because things became too serious.
What this experiment shows us is that when a person has total power over something/someone - such as a slave owner would have over his slaves - they usually become violent. The "guards" in the experiment knew that the "prisoners" were people going in, but obviously lost sight of that fact over the course of the experiment. Slaves weren't even seen as people to begin with, so it is easy to see how someone could be okay with treating someone they way slave owners treated slaves.
When the cotton economy started growing, slavery only got worse. When the inventions such as the cotton jenny, spinning wheel, et cetera came about, it sped up the cleaning, spinning, and weaving of cotton. This meant that cotton needed to be picked faster, and because there was no "magic invention" to pick cotton faster - or incentive to make one - the only solution to the problem was to make the "hands" (as slaves were called) pick faster. New inventions were created to brutally punish slaves and make them work faster, and new people were hired to use those new tools. The slave owners did not have a problem with it, because 1) they didn't see the slaves as people, 2) they were not the ones who had to punish the "hands", and 3) if they were getting more cotton in order to pay their bills or make money, who really cares how it's done?
Friday, August 26, 2016
US History 1600's to Civil War
In the class review of the timeline of the United States from the 1600's to the Civil War, we discovered the reasoning and timing for some of the major events that lead up to the creation of the United States and the beginning of the Civil War.
The biggest challenges faced by the new nation in the pre-Civil War era were getting things done and agreeing on political decisions. The first unified "government" of the US was the Articles of Confederation. It was really hard to get things done,because consent had to be unanimous before anything was permitted to happen.
The nation managed to stay unified until the Civil War, because they had a common enemy. They allowed many things and put off several decisions for a long time, because they needed to stick together and fight Britain.
Here are some pictures of the timeline that we reviewed during class:
The biggest challenges faced by the new nation in the pre-Civil War era were getting things done and agreeing on political decisions. The first unified "government" of the US was the Articles of Confederation. It was really hard to get things done,because consent had to be unanimous before anything was permitted to happen.
The nation managed to stay unified until the Civil War, because they had a common enemy. They allowed many things and put off several decisions for a long time, because they needed to stick together and fight Britain.
Here are some pictures of the timeline that we reviewed during class:
Empathy vs. Sympathy
Empathy and sympathy are very similar in that they both have to do with your reaction to another person's thoughts or feelings, but they are also very different.

The difference between empathy and sympathy is understanding or feeling. Empathy is understanding, sympathy is feeling.
As a historian, a person must be able to show empathy to those he/she is studying. If he/she is able to show empathy, it can lead to discovering and understanding why those being studied did what they did.
When you show empathy for another person, you understand what they are thinking or feeling, but you do not also feel what they are feeling. You know what they are feeling and why they are feeling it, but you do not feel it as well.
When you show sympathy for another person, you feel what they feel. If they are sad, you feel their sadness. If they are happy, you feel their happiness, etc.

The difference between empathy and sympathy is understanding or feeling. Empathy is understanding, sympathy is feeling.
As a historian, a person must be able to show empathy to those he/she is studying. If he/she is able to show empathy, it can lead to discovering and understanding why those being studied did what they did.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)